摘要:2026年希賽考博英語議論文預測:生成式AI與創造力,下面小編為大家整理了詳細內容,有報考需求的同學可以來了解下。
主題一:生成式AI與創造力
Topic: The Impact of Generative AI on Creativity
Directions: Some believe that generative AI tools (e.g., for writing or art) greatly enhance creativity, while others argue they make people lazier and weaken original thinking. What is your view?
You should write no less than 200 words on the answer paper.
【寫作思路】
類型: 觀點闡述型
開頭段:亮明核心論點:
明確表達“我”的立場——AI是“協作工具”,有“增強與普及”創造力的潛力,但前提是必須主動使用,否則有風險。
主體段:正反對比論證,提出核心解決方案:
1. 支持面:從“AI作為賦能工具”的角度展開。
2. 反對面:從“AI作為思維替代品”的風險展開。
3. 核心觀點:重申人的“心態”是關鍵,并提出方法論原則。
結尾段:結論升華:
1. 總結全文,再次強調AI是“意圖放大器”,其效果取決于使用者。
2. 提出愿景——未來是“協作伙伴關系”,并精準定義人機分工:AI負責廣度(效率、選項),人負責深度(意義、判斷)。
【參考范文】
The Impact of Generative AI on Creativity
The impact of generative AI on creativity depends completely on how humans use it. I believe that, when used as a collaborative tool rather than a replacement for thought, AI has the potential to significantly boost and make more accessible human creativity, though it undeniably presents risks if employed passively.
Proponents argue that AI serves as a powerful idea generator. It can overcome the “blank page” problem by instantly producing diverse drafts, concepts, or visual compositions, thus widening the creative horizon. For students or novice creators, it acts as a tireless coach, providing examples and feedback that speed up skill development. This lowers barriers to creative expression, making sophisticated tools available to more people.
Conversely, critics warn of the decline of independent thinking through over-reliance. If one simply accepts an AI’s first output without critique or revision, it indeed replaces the rigorous mental work that builds original thought. The risk is not in using the tool, but in surrendering control.
Therefore, the true deciding factor is the user’s mindset. AI enhances creativity only when approached with a questioning and improving attitude—when a writer uses a generated draft as inspiration to develop a unique argument, or an artist works with AI imagery to express a personal vision. The creative act shifts from pure generation to skilled selection, combination, and refinement.
In conclusion, generative AI does not inherently weaken creativity; it strengthens the user’s purpose. It rewards curiosity and effort while penalizing passivity. The future of creativity lies not in human or machine control, but in a cooperative relationship where AI manages variety and scale, and the human mind provides depth, judgment, and true meaning.
【重點詞匯】
collaborative tool 協作工具
boost /bu?st/ v.增強,促進
make accessible使可及,普及化
over-reliance /??v?r??la??ns/ n.過度依賴
mindset /?ma?ndset/ n.心態,思維模式
cooperative relationship協作關系
【精選句型】
1. The impact of generative AI on creativity depends completely on how humans use it.
生成式人工智能對創造力的影響,完全取決于人類如何使用它。
2. The risk is not in using the tool, but in surrendering control.
風險不在于使用工具,而在于放棄控制權。
3. The future of creativity lies not in human or machine control, but in a cooperative relationship where AI manages variety and scale, and the human mind provides depth, judgment, and true meaning.
創造力的未來不在于人或機器的單方主導,而在于一種協作關系:AI負責處理多樣性與規模,人腦則負責賦予深度、做出判斷并提供真正的意義。
掃碼進入小程序>>> 博士報名條件查詢
| 掃碼添加課程顧問>>> 考博英語題型咨詢
|
熱門:2026年博士招生簡章匯總
丨港澳臺地區招生丨醫學博士英語統一考試大綱
資料:2026醫學統考沖刺資料包丨2026年考博英語考前預測資料丨2025年考博英語36所真題回憶版
活動:考博上岸學員備考經驗分享
考博英語備考資料免費領取
去領取

掃一掃,進入微信小程序,各院校歷年真題隨時隨地可刷題,助力考博英語提分。
專注在線職業教育25年